
Justin Trudeau resigns as Liberal leader, criticises Pierre Poilievre’s vision for Canada as political tensions rise ahead of the election.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced his resignation as leader of the ruling Liberal Party, sparking a seismic shift in the nation’s political landscape.
Speaking at a news conference in Ottawa on Monday, Trudeau used the opportunity to sharply criticise opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, accusing him of promoting policies that “don’t make sense” for Canadians.
“Stopping the fight against climate change doesn’t make sense,” Trudeau stated. “We need an ambitious, optimistic view of the future. And Pierre Poilievre is not offering that.”
Trudeau’s resignation follows a series of political crises that have eroded public confidence in his government.
With the Liberal Party trailing in national polls, a defeat in the upcoming general election appears increasingly likely.
Meanwhile, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre seized the moment to amplify his populist agenda, calling Trudeau’s leadership a “dark chapter in our history.”
In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Poilievre outlined his vision to “take back control” of Canada, focusing on reducing taxes, enforcing strict immigration policies, and cutting government spending.
“We’ll cap spending, axe taxes, reward work, build homes, uphold family, stop crime, secure borders, rearm our forces, restore our freedom, and put Canada first,” Poilievre declared.
Poilievre has gained significant momentum in recent months, with his conservative platform resonating among voters frustrated with inflation, housing shortages, and government spending.
His campaign has also garnered support from prominent figures abroad, including Elon Musk, who praised Poilievre’s policies on social media.
As Canada braces for a pivotal election, the departure of Trudeau marks the end of an era defined by progressive policies and international diplomacy.
The coming months will test whether Poilievre’s populist vision can chart a new course for Canada—or deepen the divisions that have come to define its political discourse.
